Free L2

http://66.201.236.134/export/level2.jsp?symbol=pmgj

More good stuff from Faulk

http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1074.html

Every Little Bit Helps

http://www.pinksheets.com/about/pr_042407.jsp

Pink Sheets to Begin Rollout of Disclosure Categorization Starting May 2007

New York, NY - April 24, 2007 - Pink Sheets, LLC announced today that in May 2007 it will begin the process of categorizing issuers quoted on Pink Sheets based on a company's willingness to provide adequate public disclosure to the marketplace. Initially, each company will be assigned a proposed category, which will be indicated on their Company Info page in the Quotes & News section of www.pinksheets.com. Beginning August 1, 2007, all companies will be assigned a final category and a corresponding icon which will be displayed next to the company's symbol everywhere it appears on pinksheets.com.

All Pink Sheets companies will be placed in either the OTCQX premium tiers (companies must apply to be included) or will be assigned a disclosure category by Pink Sheets, as follows:

OTCQX Premium tiers
PremierQX - The highest tier for U.S. companies. Must meet the continuing financial requirements of Nasdaq Capital Market, provide credible disclosure to the marketplace, and nominate a Designated Advisor for Disclosure (DAD).
PrimeQX - Must have ongoing business operations, a $.25 (cents) initial bid price, provide credible disclosure to the marketplace, and nominate a DAD.

International OTCQX Premium Tiers
International PremierQX - The highest tier for international companies. Must meet the financial requirements of the NYSE's Worldwide Listing standards, be listed on a qualified international stock exchange, provide home country disclosure to U.S. investors in English, and nominate a Principle American Liaison (PAL).
International PrimeQX - Must be listed on a qualified international stock exchange, provide home country disclosure to U.S. investors in English, and nominate a PAL.

Disclosure Categories
Current Information (icon: Pink Checkmark) - Must either be registered with the SEC pursuant to 12(g) of the Securities Act and current in all electronic filings posted on the SEC's EDGAR system, OR if not registered with the SEC, must meet Pink Sheets Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information, confirmed by a quarterly letter from an attorney, all of which must be posted on the Pink Sheets News Service and displayed on pinksheets.com (*- exceptions below). Disclosure is deemed to be current if it is posted within 120 days of the fiscal year ended (annual reports) and within 60 days of the quarter ended (quarterly reports) and interim material events should be disclosed on a timely basis.

*Banks and Financial Institutions - Companies that report to federal or state banking regulators or to insurance commissions will be placed in the Current Information category if they post onto Pink Sheets News Service the same information they supply to their regulator (for example, to the FDIC), in a timely manner. An attorney letter is not required.
*Foreign Private Issuers - Non-U.S. companies that do not furnish electronic reports on the SEC's EDGAR system that are listed on a qualified international stock exchange will be placed in the Current Information category if they post onto Pink Sheets News Service the same disclosure they supply to their home country exchange and to their shareholders, in a timely manner. The disclosure must be in English. No attorney letter is required.
Limited Information (icon: Yield Sign) - SEC registered companies must have posted some disclosure on the SEC's Edgar system within the last six months. Non-SEC reporting companies must have, at a minimum, quarterly financial reports prepared in accordance with GAAP, including financial notes, and certifications by the CEO and CFO and not less than six months old, posted either on Pink Sheets News Service.

No Information (icon: Stop Sign) - The company does not make disclosure publicly available, or its available disclosure is older than six months.

Caveat Emptor/Buyer Beware (icon: Skull & Crossbones) - There is a public interest concern associated with this company, which may include a stock spam campaign or other questions concerning the security or issuer. During a spam campaign, companies that have not, at a minimum, qualified for the Current Information category will also have their company's quotes blocked on pinksheets.com.

More information on the category rollout, including Pink Sheets Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information and Attorney Letter Guidelines verifying Current Information, is available on http://www.pinksheets.com/otcguide/categories.jsp.

About Pink Sheets, LLC
Pink Sheets, LLC is the leading provider of services, software and financial information for the over-the-counter (OTC) securities markets. Its electronic quotation, trading and disclosure services enhance the efficiency of OTC trading, provide better executions for OTC investors and improve the capital formation process for OTC issuers. For more information, visit the Pink Sheets website at www.pinksheets.com.

From a Classic......

From I-Hubber:

Posted by: Dude ORama
In reply to: None Date:4/24/2007 11:56:50 AM
Post #of 232495

CMKX investors get mentioned! (Not good)

The High Cost of Kool Aid
at http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/

The poster children of the naked shorting con men are dropping like flies. The latest is a pissant little delisted stock called CMKM Diamonds.

This "company," which has no assets to speak of, is the subject of grotesque speculation that somehow massive "naked short selling" has destroyed an otherwise delightful little diamond company, and that shareholders are owed immense damages "someday." Not by the people who ran the company -- management is always blameless in naked shorting mythology -- but by the dark forces that have driven down its shares.

It is a textbook example of how naked shorting con men have deluded desperate microcap stock shareholders. A few CMKM shareholders bought in to these wacko conspiracy theories and conducted demonstrations on Times Square and in lower Manhattan. They've authored Internet rants and SEC comment letters that read as if they were written by Cho Seung-Hui, and generally made asses of themselves.

The SEC seems to feel that the problem at CMKM is with management, not real or imaginary short-sellers. It halted trading in the company two years ago, and has launched an investigation of the company. The latter was disclosed by a Wells Notice that has come as a surprise to the company's new management, since apparently the old CEO just plumb forgot to tell 'em. I kid you not.

A press release yesterday says that

As of March 29th 2007, the Company had 3 pending lawsuits, a Wells Notice from the SEC that was supposed to have been answered by March 9, 2007 (of which current management was totally unaware, until an official at the SEC contacted them on 4-10-07), and ongoing investigations by at least four government agencies. In addition there is documentation showing the forfeiture of all claims and mineral rights, no corporate records for the past 4 1/2 years of business and taxes that have never been filed. The only tangible asset is a 45 million share certificate of Entourage Mining stock.

Amazingly, some investors are still wasting time and energy expecting this dead dog to arise from its grave. To its credit, there is nothing in the latest missive from management that pushes the discredited "naked shorting" baloney.

But the naked shorting con men are continuing to promote the idea that CMKM is a victim of nefarious forces, and not its former management. Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne is the folk hero of these loons, and his loony presentation on the imaginary "stock counterfeiting" conspiracy is a mainstay of the naked shorting con men.

Byrne's latest rant on the subject, a childish press release designed to divert attention from the company's quarterly red-ink announcement, was discussed in this blog yesterday.

The Baloney Brigade marches on, but its fraudulent character is becoming increasingly obvious. SEC Chairman Christopher Cox should stop pandering to these idiots and direct his staff to move on to more pressing issues.

Free L2

Another free L2 site:

http://66.201.236.134/export/level2.jsp?symbol=pmgj

The old one listed now requires registration and is only free for 30 days.

Faulk is a Goodin'

6 billion a day in FTD's.

The SEC says it does not matter.

http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1073.html

For those new to the Game.....

A nice little board to get the newbies started:

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=7489

Kudos to lowman.

Really?

The Penny Stock Epidemic - The Tangled Web They Weave\

Investor Information
April 10 2007

Where do penny stock crooks find their victims? Everywhere around the globe. This is an international epidemic, spreading at a record pace, thanks to the efforts of boiler rooms, greedy promoters and unscrupulous company insiders.

Lately, we have been hearing from more and more readers around the world who have been touched by securities scams. It makes perfect sense. Con artists know that U.S. regulators are unlikely to raise their colors on behalf of an individual investor in Barbados, Germany or the Philippines who has tossed away his life's savings buying unregistered shares of an obscure U.S. public company. So the clever pitchmen peddle their wares overseas, then sit back stateside and bank their profits.

Most frequently, fraudulent schemes involve shares of obscure companies which have few assets, negligible revenues, and dubious operations. But foreign investors - and many domestic ones as well - do not know this. They only know what the salesman is saying. And for the foreign individual investor the U.S.-based broker has instant credibility. The con artist relies on the fact that most people in other countries - and many right here - cannot distinguish a legitimate brokerage firm from a fly-by-night operation.

Stock schemes commonly involve shares of companies that trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, Pink Sheets, or non-U.S. exchanges. As of March 2007, 3,472 companies were listed on the OTC Bulletin Board. Another 4,874 stocks were quoted solely on the Pink Sheets. Almost 37 billion shares changed hands on the OTC Bulletin Board in March 2007 alone – an average daily volume of well over one billion shares a day.

This arena is a crucible for securities schemes. Regulatory resources are strained, and frequently focused in other directions. The global nature of these schemes, and the ease with which companies can issue unregistered stock and sell it overseas, makes meaningful oversight difficult - and often impossible.

The term "penny stocks" is something of a misnomer, since it includes stocks that trade for $5 a share or less. Penny stock rules are designed to protect the public since investments in these low priced securities tend to be speculative and risky. When stock brokers recommend these penny stocks they are required to have an existing relationship with their customer or to determine that such investments are suitable for a new customer. Unscrupulous promoters and boiler room operators generally ignore these rules.

Although penny stock schemes are frequently successful, they seldom are subtle. Unlike the elaborate accounting schemes that accompanied massive corporate frauds at the beginning of this decade - Enron, WorldCom and the like - penny stock frauds usually rely on the garden variety "pump and dump" scheme. In many cases promoters or shady stock brokers gain control of a company and then spread false and misleading information by saturating the Internet with spam email or using cold callers to tout shares. In this way they spark interest in the company, pump up prices, and create an environment in which they can sell stock. Once the promoters dump their shares, stock prices slide back toward oblivion. The game takes on several variations, but the basic framework seldom differs.

Often, these schemes employ one or more of the following tools:

E-mails touting little known struggling companies with virtually no chance of success. These spam e-mails seldom identify the sender or provide accurate contact information. They do not provide a balanced view or disclose investment risks. E-mails promoting worthless companies have proliferated in recent years, appealing to investors around the world.

Unrealistic financial reports and research reports that tout a company without presenting a balanced view and occasionally include unsupportable financial projections.

Press releases that are issued to create a buzz about a company. Upon close examination, these press releases are short on details and long on unrealistic promises. They provide just enough information to whet an investor's appetite.

Announcements that an obscure under capitalized company is about to become a player in a cutting edge industry. After a season of brutal hurricanes, promoters seized upon the plight of storm victims to tout tiny companies that claimed to be poised to profit from relief efforts. For the most part, these claims were without substance.

Internet message boards used to tout or attack a company. Message boards have become a haven for zealots who are prepared to defend worthless companies, even though every available fact indicates that the company has virtually no chance of success. They offer little opportunity for honest debate; just a forum for a company's fans, where negative messages are labeled as "bashing" and critics of the company are accused of undermining the stock.

Shady stockbrokers use aggressive tactics, distorting "facts" about companies and intimidating potential investors.

As we noted, these schemes are transparent. There are a number of bright red flags that should trigger concern:

Claims that an obscure company is poised to capitalize in a "hot" sector, like video sharing, homeland defense, hurricane recovery or AIDS research. In the wake of
September 11th many of these schemes claimed to have developed cures for anthrax and other biological threats.

Companies claim to have relationships with better known, successful businesses. Usually, these relationships are non-existent or insignificant.

The company being promoted does not file regular public financial reports with the SEC.

The company being promoted has negligible assets or revenues.

There has been unusual, excessive trading in a stock.

There have been sudden dramatic price swings for the stock of a company with no track record, discernible business or demonstrated revenues.

The Company routinely uses Form S-8 to register shares for insiders, employees or consultants. Form S-8 allows companies and promoters to flood the marketplace instantly, with registered shares that have been issued to anonymous individuals and companies.

A company with little operating history employs numerous consultants and awards them shares.

The company sells unregistered stock overseas under Regulation S. Regulation S has created a virtually unregulated environment for offshore sale of U.S. securities. Companies listed on U.S. exchanges may sell unregistered stock to non-U.S. residents. U.S. investors are protected because those shares cannot be resold in the U.S. for at least one year. Overseas investors? They are on their own.

The company has engaged in one or more reverse-mergers.

The company has offshore investors whose principals are undisclosed.

A public company frequently changes its business plan, while maintaining the same management.

The business is incorporated in Nevada. Nevada corporate law affords the individuals in control of a company to make significant decisions without first notifying or gaining approval from public shareholders.

Canadian connections. Tiny companies have proliferated with the following in common: they are incorporated in Nevada, have offices in Canada (usually British Columbia), have attorneys in Florida, California or New York, and often use transfer agents housed in Utah. Their goal is to create a jurisdictional blend that allows them to scam investors in the U.S., Canada and around the world. In order to catch these crooks, regulators from these various jurisdictions must cooperate. That takes time and resources – and plays into the hands of promoters who are operating at a far quicker pace.

Where does this leave investors? The red flags are there – and obvious to even the most nearsighted and shortsighted. The bottom line remains, as always – before you invest, investigate.

Work It Baby!!!!!!

http://money.iwon.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_ge.jsp?news_id=cmt-099b0440&feed=cmt&date=20070409

PrimeHoldings.Com's Mindpix, Inc - UltraFlex Now Used by Professional Athletes in NBA and MLB

Monday April 9, 4:07 PM EDT

SALT LAKE CITY, Apr 09, 2007 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- PrimeHoldings.Com, Inc. (Pink Sheets:PMGJ), a diversified holding company with early mover initiatives in telecommunications and other strategic industries, today announced that Mindpix, Inc.'s (http://www.mindpix.com/) flagship product UltraFlex is being used successfully in strength training, rehabilitation and performance enhancement by professional athletes in both the National Basketball Association and Major League Baseball.
"UltraFlex is well on its way to becoming a huge hit in the areas of training, conditioning and rehabilitation of professional athletes," stated David R. Ballif, CEO of Mindpix, Inc. "High-profile players are rehabilitating sooner and professional trainers are getting significantly better results with UltraFlex," continued Mr. Ballif.

"In my 20-plus years of experience working with professional athletes, I have not been this enthusiastic about a new training device like UltraFlex," stated Keith Kocher PT, FOMT, FAAOMPT, Regional Manager, Physiotherapy Associates. "UltraFlex is a combination of effective target resistance and portability that is unmatched in our industry," added Mr. Kocher.
Mr. Keith Kocher is a regional manager, overseeing over 40 clinics, including being Clinic Director of the nationally renowned Tempe SPORTS Clinic, for Physiotherapy Associates, Inc. Mr. Kocher is nationally recognized for his research and practical application of physical therapy and rehabilitation with professional athletes.

More information about PrimeHoldings.Com can be found at http://www.stockinformationsystems.com/c/PMGJ/index.html.

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Statements in this press release relating to plans, strategies, economic performance and trends, projections of results of specific activities or investments, and other statements that are not descriptions of historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking information is inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, risk factors inherent in doing business. Forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "expects," "plans," "intends," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "forecasts," "potential," or "continue," or similar terms or the negative of these terms. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The company has no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

SOURCE: PrimeHoldings.Com, Inc.

CONTACT: PrimeHoldings.Com, Inc., Salt Lake City

Thomas Aliprandi, 801-755-6859
Copyright Business Wire 2007

Obscure?

link: http://www.thesanitycheck.com/Default.aspx?tabid=56&EntryID=584

Location: Blogs Bob O'Brien's Sanity Check Blog

Posted by: bobo
3/12/2007 10:31 PM
UPDATE - I've had a lot of folks email me and ask what they can do to help in this battle against international cartels of predatory miscreants, aided by our own Wall Street bankers.
How about demanding hearings and the inevitable special prosecutor? As I have been arguing for now for two years?
Check out this sample letter, posted on Investorvillage.com - if everyone takes a few seconds out and sends this to the addressees, they will be deluged with demands for action.
And that will make you part of the solution, rather than food for the machine.
It's a start.
----------------------
Everyone, go watch the Bloomberg TV special on NSS.
You can see it at YouTube, or download it to your desktop from a mirror site here. I would recommend Youtube, where you should also take out a moment and rate it, and make it a favorite rating for yourself. That gets it higher in the visibility chain, which in turn then gets more folks interested in watching it, enhancing the viral spread of the message.
Folks, this is a landmark program, as it tells most of the story in a manner that the average person can understand.
What's particularly sad about this is that the DTCC and the brokers were all offered the opportunity to testify...er...speak, and defend themselves, and reassure everyone as to how small a problem this is...and they wouldn't do it. Wouldn't say a word. Nobody wants to talk. The best they could get is Chanos, refusing to look into the camera, claiming "he" has never naked shorted, and telling everyone that it isn't a big deal. Of course, he doesn't actually know how big a deal it is, anymore than you or I do, but he is just sure it can't be all that bad. Even the DTCC claims it doesn't know how big the problem is, but Chanos does.
I suppose he hasn't looked at the FOIA data or the SIA's spreadsheet showing a deci-billion dollar problem, or more. No, why discuss the actual naked short selling when you can blame the victim company, ignore the hard data, and proclaim it all as a "Red Herring?" That seems to be the prevailing way Wall Street handles the issue. First, there's no problem. Then, it's a non-issue if there is a problem. Then, it isn't me doing it, it's someone else. Classic lying guys lying about their lies. Really good stuff. No explanation is furnished explaining all the data showing a massive counterfeiting problem - it's all those bad CEOs trying to take the heat off their failure to perform.
I'm not sure whether we should call that doing a Chanos, or pulling a Nocera. I'm open to suggestions.
UPDATE 3/14/07: Goldman was just sanctioned for mismarking short sales as long sales. They were caught processing trades for 2 customers who were mislabelling their sales as long in order to be able to sell stocks that had short restrictions. Lehman says it is the customers' fault. Does anyone really believe this only happened with two customers? Please .
So we have the prime brokers blaming the customers, and the customers like Chanos blaming the brokers. How can that be? It's almost as though both are completely complicit and looking for scapegoats once they've stolen all the money they can carry. Kind of amusing how the crooks point at each other the second light shines on them..."It wasn't me. It was them. I'm not bad. They are." Just insert your favorite scapegoat...
Now back to the original blog: There are some great moments in the program. The comparison to "The Producers" is really funny.
Byrne, from the show: "Maybe if you ran a better liquor store, they would stop robbing it." Classic.
The show tells the story in the best terms I've ever seen.
Put simply, brokers are taking buyers' money, and then refusing to deliver the shares they were paid for, preferring to pocket the money and incur no expense for buying and delivering the shares.
Because the system treats electronic IOUs generated by the brokers the same as legitimate shares, they can do this for years in targeted stocks, and nothing will stop them. It is stealing, and fraud. Simple.
My only problem with the special is that it didn't explain that the $6 billion per day of fails to deliver and receive were AFTER CNS netting nets 96% of the trades in the system - sells against shares held long. That means that the $6 billion per day is after all the shares the brokers own on behalf of their clients are netted against sales for the day, and only after 100% of those shares are used up, then, the first delivery failure is registered. So on a typical day, where $100 billion of stock is traded, after all the netting takes care of $96 billion of sales with no delivery as well as genuine sales with delivery, there is still a cumulative $6 billion undelivered. It is estimated that about $2 billion is new fails for the day, with $1 billion of that being handled by the DTCC's stock borrow program, which is really a stock lending program. So CNS netting "handles" 96% of all trades, effectively masking or hiding the number of fails, and of the 4% remaining un-handled, half fail. 50%. You are reading this correctly. One half of all un-netted trades fail per day. Which would lead a thinking person to believe that as many as one half of all trades fail per day, but CNS netting masks 96% of those by offsetting the undelivered trades with shares held long for other customers, "netting" the long shares (+ signs) against the sales - REGARDLESS OF DELIVERY - (- signs), and "handling" 96% of the trades in that way. But even after all shares held long are used up to offset the minuses, there are still FTDs.
And the SIA's own spreadsheet tells the whole story of the number before netting masks it - $63 billion on the last day of Q2, 2006. Which is about 50% of $120 billion, and right in line with the above equation. You can view that spreadsheet on this site's home page, where it is linked, in red.
That is massively scary, and a completely different picture than the one Wall Street tries to spin. They figure that netting is so obscure nobody will ever understand it, so they can come out with a benign number that sounds small, and claim it is technically true.
Other than that, this is the biggest thing to hit the NSS story for years. It is what Dateline should have been.
Send it to every paper and elected official on the planet. Every radio talk show. Every blog.
No wonder Nocera ran a hatchet job on Byrne over the weekend. Wall Street heard this was coming. So they had to take one last swipe at trying to smear him, as well as prominent folks in the NSS battle.
It didn't work.
Send this to everyone. It's time.

More B. S.

I got a p&d email on this today:

Pay close attention to the part I bolded.

"Watch List for Monday 4-2-2007

My new big pick is PMGJ.

Make sure you start your researching by looking at the chart on PMGJ. If you didn't read my last email here is the chart again:

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=pmgj&sid=0&o_symb=pmgj&f
... This is the classic ascending triangle pattern which could signify a big breakout!!!

A more formal explanation of this pattern can be found here: http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:ascending_trian...

I believe PMGJ's home fitness product is going to put all other products on the market to shame.

People can use the UltraFlex almost anywhere, anytime. It's a "fitness on the go" kind of product. We're excited about producing the UltraFlex infomercial because we've seen with our own eyes the incredible results people can get in a very short period of time," said Marcia Waldorf.

PMGJ just signed a production agreement with industry leader Waldorf Crawford earlier this month.

"With over 18 years of writing, directing and producing successful infomercials Waldorf Crawford delivers the experience, creativity and track record required to have a highly successful UltraFlex product launch," said David Ballif.

I believe PMGJ is going to be huge in the fitness industry once people become aware of it.

PMGJ knows that the fastest way to reach millions of potential buyers is through infomercials. Most of the latest fitness equipment out there is advertised to people via infomercial.

According to statistics, at one point $518 million dollars a year was made from the sale of exercise equipment through infomercials!

It was infomercials that made Chuck Norris and Christie Brinkley and the Total Gym so popular.

PMGJ recently signed celebrity host, Forbes Riley, direct response TV star, to host the UltraFlex infomercial.

PMGJ's subsidiary Mindpix Inc. is responsible for the UltraFlex Fitness (TM).

PMGJ's UltraFlex is a revolutionary new fitness product based upon aerospace technology that provides a unique and effective form of resistance training.

This is a new kind of fitness that I don't think any home gym should be without!

With PMGJ's UltraFlex, the resistance is variable in that it increases as you go through a range of motion and by changing hand or body positions. The UltraFlex resistance increases as you bring the ends together and is defined as Target Perfect Resistance.

Just last month PMGJ completed their first major university physiological study on the UltraFlex. The results were astonishing!

David Ballif, CEO of Mindpix, Inc. said, "To have such statistically significant results from our first study is exciting. One segment showed a 71% increase in calories burned by simply walking and using the UltraFlex."

A six week life style study was also done on PMGJ's UltraFlex and the results here were just as amazing.

"We had never seen anything like the results our testimonial group got using the UltraFlex. Across the board, the 20 people who participated in our consumer study experienced not only astounding fat losses, but major increases in lean muscle mass, all in just six weeks.

This is huge for PMGJ!

David R. Ballif, CEO of Mindpix Inc. said "In our industry, signing Forbes Riley to host our UltraFlex infomercial compares to signing Julia Roberts or Nicole Kidman in the movie industry. Forbes Riley hosted shows have combined for $1 billion dollars in product sales. We are fortunate to have her."

PMGJ has a product that Forbes Riley is proud to represent. Someone like Riley backing the Ultra Flex allows me to believe that PMGJ will become a giant!

"My standards are so high when I look for a product to be associated with, and when the team from UltraFlex approached me with this new fitness phenomenon.... I just jumped at the chance to be a part of it," said Riley.

For more information on PMGJ's UltraFlex visit: www.mindpix.com

Never invest in any stock featured on our site or emails unless you can afford to lose your entire investment.r> *********************************************************
The disclaimer is to be read and fully understood before using our site, or joining our email list.
PLEASE NOTE WELL: The Hototc.com employees are not Registered as an Investment Advisor in any jurisdiction whatsoever. Full disclaimer can be read at http://www.Hototc.com/disclaimer.htm

Release of Liability: Through use of this website viewing or using you agree to hold Hototc.com, its operators owners and employees harmless and to completely release them from any and all liability due to any and all loss (monetary or otherwise), damage (monetary or otherwise), or injury (monetary or otherwise) that you may incur. The information contained herein is based on sources which we believe to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us as being accurate and does not purport to be a complete statement or summary of the available data. The owner, publisher, editor and their associates are not responsible for errors and omissions. They may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Hototc.com encourages readers and investors to supplement the information in these reports with independent research and other professional advice. Hototc.com has been compensated by a third party JTLD Consulting fifteen thousand dollars for a one month PMGJ advertising services contract. All information on featured companies is provided by the companies profiled, or is available from public sources and Hototc.com makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure by the profiled companies. Hototc.com, nor any of its affiliates are not registered investment advisors or a broker dealers."